Guess what's vegan



Untitled

Musings on gender, sexuality, and the way things work






FollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowed

Theme by spaceperson Powered by Tumblr

klammer
Glad to see psychology is basing their research on such timeless and incontrovertibly objective standards like “attractiveness.”  Might I suggest that our notions about attractiveness could be affected by… structural racism and the US’ particular history of white supremacy and racial oppression, ableism, historically and culturally contingent fat-phobia, transphobia, and the ever-changing fashion standards dictated by our capitalist culture?  Sure am glad to know that a little hard science can straighten all that out
blackfashion:

OP: fuckyeahfamousblackgirls
On May 15, 2011, Psychology Today contributor, Satoshi Kanazawa posted an article entitled “Why Are Black Women Less Physically Attractive Than Other Women?”.  We demand that the Psychology Today editorial board publicly account for how and why this racist and sexist article was allowed to be published on the Psychology Today website, and take transparent steps to prevent this from happening in the future.   Kanazawa’s article is nothing more than a vile regurgitation of racist and sexist beliefs about black women disguised as “objective” and “scientific” research findings, and contributes to a historical legacy of using distorted “science” as a tool to justify violent ideas about and treatment of black women. Kanazawa has a history of writing biased and error-ridden articles that attempt to justify racist beliefs. Other scientists have discredited his research and his legitimacy as a social scientist has been called into question.  That Psychology Today publishes Kanazawa’s often problematic articles casts serious doubt about the trustworthiness of their publications as well as the rigor of their editorial process.  Psychology Today is not just a magazine and website, but it’s also a site that people access resources for mental health services for their well being.  Publishing damaging and crude articles such as Kanazawa’s demonstrates a profound disrespect for anyone who turns to Psychology Today for these resources.  Though Psychology Today has removed the article from their website without explanation, the editors have not acknowledged or taken responsibility for publishing the article, discussed the editorial standards they require from their contributors and whether this article satisfied those standards, or explained why Kanazawa remains as a contributor, despite being discredited by other social scientists.  Psychology Today editors have a journalistic and ethical duty to be both transparent about how this article was published and accountable for this failure in public trust.
Because of the damage that this kind of misinformation creates for both the public and Psychology Today, we demand the following:
1) a public statement from Psychology Today editors demonstrating accountability for the article itself and the editorial conditions that allowed this article to be published on your website.
2) the removal of Satoshi Kanazawa as a contributor to your website, magazine, and any other Psychology Today publications based on his history of discredited research and repeatedly submitting racially biased articles to Psychology Today, including this most recent disturbing article that your editors chose to abruptly scrub from your website.  
3) and the development of more thoughtful and sophisticated strategies for identifying how racism, sexism, homophobia/transphobia, and other oppressions and biases shape any so-called “objective” scientific inquiries, methodologies, and findings that your contributors examine in your publications.  These strategies should be communicated to the public in an effort to be more transparent about how you are disrupting bias in your reporting.
Also, please visit this additional important change.org petition demanding that “psychological professional associations to devise a formal statement alerting the public that, given their track record, Psychology Today should not be considered a reliable source of psychological knowledge.”  This petition has been endorsed by the following people:  Alisa Bierria Aishah Shahidah Simmons James Braxton Peterson, Ph.D. Wil Gafney, Ph.D. Beverly Guy-Sheftall, Ph.D. Yvonne Welbon, Ph.D. R L’Heureux Lewis, Ph.D. Alexis Pauline Gumbs, Ph.D. Mark Anthony Neal, Ph.D. Jennifer Williams, Ph.D. Tamura A. Lomax, Ph.D. Erica R. Edwards, Ph.D. Tishana Trainor Tarana Burke Imani Uzuri Kenyon Farrow Linda Perkins, Ph.D. Llanor Alleyne Yolo Akil Kim Ford Yaba Amgborale Blay, Ph.D. Ruby Sales Brittney Cooper, Ph.D. Susana Morris, Ph.D. Tiona McClodden Amina Wadud, Ph.D. Moya Bailey Sarah Haley, Ph.D. Gwendolyn Zoharah Simmons, Ph.D. Tracy Sharpley-Whiting, Ph.D. Sofia Quintero Osizwe Raena Harwell, Ph.D. Nuala Cabral Alondra Nelson, Ph.D. Asha French Salamishah Tillet, Ph.D. Joan Morgan Crunk Feminist Collective Ava DuVernay Carla Jean-McNeil Jackson, Esq. Christa Bell Marlo Denice David, Ph.D. Valerie Ann Johnson, Ph.D. Carla Stokes, Ph.D.

Please reblog this and sign the petition by clicking the photo or visiting this page.

Glad to see psychology is basing their research on such timeless and incontrovertibly objective standards like “attractiveness.”  Might I suggest that our notions about attractiveness could be affected by… structural racism and the US’ particular history of white supremacy and racial oppression, ableism, historically and culturally contingent fat-phobia, transphobia, and the ever-changing fashion standards dictated by our capitalist culture?  Sure am glad to know that a little hard science can straighten all that out

blackfashion:

OP: fuckyeahfamousblackgirls

On May 15, 2011, Psychology Today contributor, Satoshi Kanazawa posted an article entitled “Why Are Black Women Less Physically Attractive Than Other Women?”. We demand that the Psychology Today editorial board publicly account for how and why this racist and sexist article was allowed to be published on the Psychology Today website, and take transparent steps to prevent this from happening in the future. Kanazawa’s article is nothing more than a vile regurgitation of racist and sexist beliefs about black women disguised as “objective” and “scientific” research findings, and contributes to a historical legacy of using distorted “science” as a tool to justify violent ideas about and treatment of black women. Kanazawa has a history of writing biased and error-ridden articles that attempt to justify racist beliefs. Other scientists have discredited his research and his legitimacy as a social scientist has been called into question. That Psychology Today publishes Kanazawa’s often problematic articles casts serious doubt about the trustworthiness of their publications as well as the rigor of their editorial process. Psychology Today is not just a magazine and website, but it’s also a site that people access resources for mental health services for their well being. Publishing damaging and crude articles such as Kanazawa’s demonstrates a profound disrespect for anyone who turns to Psychology Today for these resources. Though Psychology Today has removed the article from their website without explanation, the editors have not acknowledged or taken responsibility for publishing the article, discussed the editorial standards they require from their contributors and whether this article satisfied those standards, or explained why Kanazawa remains as a contributor, despite being discredited by other social scientists. Psychology Today editors have a journalistic and ethical duty to be both transparent about how this article was published and accountable for this failure in public trust.

Because of the damage that this kind of misinformation creates for both the public and Psychology Today, we demand the following:

1) a public statement from Psychology Today editors demonstrating accountability for the article itself and the editorial conditions that allowed this article to be published on your website.

2) the removal of Satoshi Kanazawa as a contributor to your website, magazine, and any other Psychology Today publications based on his history of discredited research and repeatedly submitting racially biased articles to Psychology Today, including this most recent disturbing article that your editors chose to abruptly scrub from your website.  

3) and the development of more thoughtful and sophisticated strategies for identifying how racism, sexism, homophobia/transphobia, and other oppressions and biases shape any so-called “objective” scientific inquiries, methodologies, and findings that your contributors examine in your publications. These strategies should be communicated to the public in an effort to be more transparent about how you are disrupting bias in your reporting.

Also, please visit this additional important change.org petition demanding that “psychological professional associations to devise a formal statement alerting the public that, given their track record, Psychology Today should not be considered a reliable source of psychological knowledge.” This petition has been endorsed by the following people: Alisa Bierria Aishah Shahidah Simmons James Braxton Peterson, Ph.D. Wil Gafney, Ph.D. Beverly Guy-Sheftall, Ph.D. Yvonne Welbon, Ph.D. R L’Heureux Lewis, Ph.D. Alexis Pauline Gumbs, Ph.D. Mark Anthony Neal, Ph.D. Jennifer Williams, Ph.D. Tamura A. Lomax, Ph.D. Erica R. Edwards, Ph.D. Tishana Trainor Tarana Burke Imani Uzuri Kenyon Farrow Linda Perkins, Ph.D. Llanor Alleyne Yolo Akil Kim Ford Yaba Amgborale Blay, Ph.D. Ruby Sales Brittney Cooper, Ph.D. Susana Morris, Ph.D. Tiona McClodden Amina Wadud, Ph.D. Moya Bailey Sarah Haley, Ph.D. Gwendolyn Zoharah Simmons, Ph.D. Tracy Sharpley-Whiting, Ph.D. Sofia Quintero Osizwe Raena Harwell, Ph.D. Nuala Cabral Alondra Nelson, Ph.D. Asha French Salamishah Tillet, Ph.D. Joan Morgan Crunk Feminist Collective Ava DuVernay Carla Jean-McNeil Jackson, Esq. Christa Bell Marlo Denice David, Ph.D. Valerie Ann Johnson, Ph.D. Carla Stokes, Ph.D.

Please reblog this and sign the petition by clicking the photo or visiting this page.

04:21 pm, reblogged from black beauty by guesswhatsvegan581 notes

Notes
  1. nightmarrish reblogged this from blackfashion
  2. lovescrescendo reblogged this from greatdistractions
  3. lawlspy reblogged this from weeaboo-chan and added:
    Er, wow. What kind of asshole does this kind of shit? Really?
  4. greatdistractions reblogged this from stealingfirefromprometheus and added:
    The fact that something like this article would even get WRITTEN much less published disgusts me. The hell is wrong with...
  5. hoodaff-uck reblogged this from jojodoodle
  6. nutsacques reblogged this from myencephalonjourneys
  7. myencephalonjourneys reblogged this from fuckyeahfamousblackgirls
  8. esachicasabes reblogged this from fueetmee and added:
    Satoshi Kanazawa is a truck hitting the water
  9. brttnyw reblogged this from blackculture
  10. o-h-m reblogged this from black-culture
  11. pynkstarr reblogged this from blackfashion
  12. lighthouseaccident reblogged this from batcaps
  13. 4juicy reblogged this from black-culture
  14. fueetmee reblogged this from black-culture
  15. batcaps reblogged this from blackfashion
  16. hyeolaek reblogged this from purdyycolors and added:
    Psychology Today, I pay for you. Better stop being racist.
  17. purdyycolors reblogged this from holdmetighter
  18. holdmetighter reblogged this from mickyalexandria
  19. divineconceptionoftheheart reblogged this from revolutionaryminded
  20. its-deja reblogged this from black-culture
  21. dallastar reblogged this from black-culture
  22. getkinkygonatural reblogged this from blackculture
  23. gcolli reblogged this from black-culture and added:
    Black Girls are the Best Please!!
  24. queenofprospit reblogged this from daughterofadragon
  25. kn2artsandphotography reblogged this from sharayn
  26. ohsnapsitsjessie reblogged this from black-culture
  27. revolutionaryminded reblogged this from black-culture
  28. applecores reblogged this from black-culture
  29. thelipstickdiaries reblogged this from black-culture
  30. blaketalon reblogged this from sharayn
  31. anaerb reblogged this from blackculture
  32. mickyalexandria reblogged this from black-culture
  33. fuckmetwice reblogged this from black-culture
  34. sharayn reblogged this from black-culture
  35. black-culture reblogged this from blackculture